Planning lessons with technology

At this stage I have no experience teaching, nor have I completed any work placement. My very limited exposure to lesson planning is in the form of assessment tasks which form part of this Masters degree. This lack of teaching experience poses difficulties when trying to self-assess my positioning on the TPACK chart. I lack experience, confident and knowledge to some degree, and all I can say with confidence is that as a pre-service teacher I will activity work towards the centre of the TPACK Venn Diagram reflecting; Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge.

Entering the HISE faculty as a pre-service teacher, I will focused on students critically analyse and appreciate the people, forces, events and ideas that have shaped the modern world (BOSTES, 2017, p. 12). The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) states that learning is enhanced through the use of multimodal resources, digital environments and technologies within a classroom setting. This is achieved through access to live target language environments and texts via digital media, which extends the boundaries of the classroom (ACARA). Extending the boundaries of the classroom promotes student centred learning, as they are not restricted by the texts or content delivered by the teacher. Students are able to construct their own ideas and knowledge through a variety of informative sources. Therefore, it creates critical and creative thinkers, which is an essential component of being a successful 21st century learner.

Reference

NSW Board of Studies Teaching and Education Standards [BOSTES]. (2017). Modern History Stage 6 syllabus: NSW syllabus for the Australian curriculum. Sydney: NSW Board of Studies.

Classroom technologies and ethical issues

Roblyer & Doering (2014, p.25) identify issues that are shaping the teaching environment, and the responses and responsibilities of Teachers. In a digitally saturated environment one fundamental issue is new plagiarism and digital dishonesty.

Gabriel (2010) refers to the findings of Donald L. McCabe, who surveyed 14,000 undergraduates from 2006 to 2010 and found 40 percent had “admitted to copying a few sentences in written assignments” (Gabriel, 2010). More alarming was a shift in students perception of plagiarism, with results illustrating only 29 percent of students believed copy information for internet constitutes “serious cheating which was a 5 percent reduction since the last decade.

As teachers we need to educate students about how appropriately use information and how to avoid unintentional plagiarism (Roblyer & Doering, 2012, p. 25).

Reference:

Gabriel, T. (Aug 01, 2010). Plagiarism Lines Blue for Students in Digital Age.New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/education/02cheat.html

Roblyer, M., & Doering, A. (2014). Pearson New International Edition. Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Harlow, England: Pearson.

Web-based learning

Below is an example of how web-based resources can be incorporated into teaching Stage 5 History Syllabus. The focus, Depth Study 4: Rights and freedoms (1945–present), where students study the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples since European “settlement” of Australia.

YouTube EDU can be utilised as a ICT research task, as students investigated the forcible removal of Aboriginal children.

When investigating the struggle of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples for rights and freedoms before 1965, and introducing the 1938 Day of Mourning and the Stolen Generations, students can utilised Google Cultural Institute, which has a plethora of relevant information, one I particularly like is; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Activists – Stories of Extraordinary First Australians, which can be accessed via; https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/beta/exhibit/cQLS3Nb4pscFLQ

The integration of ICT, can lead to enhanced outcomes for students, by promoting and supporting the interactive process (NSW Education Standards Authority, n.d.).

Reference

NSW Education Standards Authority. (n.d.). Integrating ICT Capability. Retrieved from http://syllabus.nesa.nsw.edu.au/support-materials/integrating-ict/

 

Web 2.0 resources and issues

Three ways Web 2.0 tools can be incorporated teaching;

Study ladder

https://www.studyladder.com.au/teacher/resources/activity?activity_id=27154

This resource covers various aspects of the ICT capability areas. It can be utilised as an interactive educational tool for students, as it provides information and quizzes about ICT protocols.

Study Ladder relates to ICT capability one, ” Applying social and ethical protocols and practices when using ICT element, recognising intellectual property.” It can act as a summative assessment tool for students to test their knowledge on ethical dilemmas when utilising intellectual property (ACARA, n.d.).

 YouTube – Technology and Society search

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=technology+and+society

This provides students and teachers with many resources and discussion points for the impact of ICT on society. Students are able to explore and form their own opinion based on the various videos attached to the above link.

 The YouTube clips relate to ICT capability one, ” Applying social and ethical protocols and practices when using ICT element, identifying the impacts of ICT on society.” It provides a stimulus for improving an individual’s knowledge about explain the main uses of ICT and potential on their lives (ACARA, n.d.).

Google

https://www.google.com.au/

This an internet based search engine. Meaning it allows the user to type into a search field to access information. It can also be altered into a more specific search engine such as Google Books (https://books.google.com.au/), Google Images (https://images.google.com/) and Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com.au/)

 Google relates to ICT capability two, “Investigating with ICT element, locating, generating and accessing data and information.” This is a user friendly search engine that allows for the retrieval and location of information (ACARA, n.d.). As the user becomes more advanced, they could start to filter the information generated by using variations of this search engine as mentioned above.

 Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying and online harassment is a growing concern as 21st century learners spend increasing amounts of time online is a social context. It is estimated that 72% of adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years have reported having been cyberbullied (Roblyer & Doering, 2014, p. 26).

The Victorian Department of Education and Training (2017), has identified types of cyberbullying as; pranking, image sharing, sexually explicit images, text and email, personal online information, identity theft, and hate sites. There are other forms of cyberbullying.

Reference

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (n.d). General capabilities. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/languages/general-capabilities/

Roblyer, M., & Doering, A. (2014). Pearson New International Edition. Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Harlow, England: Pearson.

Victoria State Government, Education and Training. (2017). Cyberbullying. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/programs/bullystoppers/Pages/cyberbullying.aspx

Technology in HSIE

The Key Learning Area (KLA) for Human Society and Its Environment (HSIE) includes the History K–10 Syllabus, Geography K–10 Syllabus and new Stage 6 syllabuses. The importance of what is loosely grouped as ‘social’ and ‘environmental’ subjects are fundamental in the education of young Australians (Marsh, 2008).

The rationale for including social and environmental subjects as part of the curriculum is highlighted by the Goals of The Adelaide Declaration on National Goals for Schooling in the Twenty-First Century; which aim to equip school leavers with the capacity to make informed decisions in regard to ethical, social justice and matters of morality, to ensure they active and informed members of society (Marsh, 2008).

It is only the HSIE curriculum that helps young people understand such social issues, and take any appropriate action at a personal level, having a much broader role and impact in the lives of students then mere subjects for academic study. Further it is the one major discipline, which provides context on how we have reached our current state as groups, societies, nations and individuals. (Taylor, Fahey, Kriewaldt & Boon, 2012).

Whilst the Australian Curriculum outlines what is to be learning outcomes in the HSIE curriculum, it is the process of translating the curriculum into sequential, engaging and relevant learning experiences that will determine its success (Gilbert & Hoepper, 2017 p. 75). Worthwhile learning experiences are believed to reveal new understandings, be appropriate to students’ backgrounds, support high expectations, the respect of and inclusion of all students, encourage critical analysis, promote deep authentic learning through higher order thinking and ensure connectedness to the world beyond the classroom (Gilbert & Hoepper, 2017 p. 75).

The development of pedagogical approaches in achieving outcomes must consider all students backgrounds, experiences and learning styles. The ‘technology’ component of TPACK (Technological Pedagogical and Content. Knowledge) is fundamental to curriculum implementation and the incorporation of ICTs (Roblyer, & Doering, 2014 p. 366).

Samples of  learning ICTs which will be incorporated into HSIE include; Muzzy Lane’s Making History (http://www.muzzylane.com/products/making-history/) and The Oregon Trail (http://www.learningcompany.com) , addressing themes of continuity and change, power authority and governance.  The International Communication and Negotiation Simulations (ICONS) (http://www.icons.umd.edu) addressing themes of Global connections.

Gilbert, R. & Hoepper, B. (Eds.) (2017). Teaching Humanities and Social Sciences: History, Geography, Economics and Citizenship in the Australian curriculum. (6th ed.). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning.

Marsh, C. J. (2008). Studies of society and environment: exploring the teaching possibilities. (5th ed). Pearson Education Australia: Frenchs Forest, NSW.

Roblyer, M., & Doering, A. (2014). Pearson New International Edition. Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Harlow, England: Pearson.

Taylor, T., Fahey, C., Kriewaldt, J., & Boon, D. (2012). Place and Time: Explorations in Teaching Geography and History. Frenchs Forest: Pearson

Learning Management Systems

An advantage of introducing a LMS into classroom practices is its ability to create innovative learning environments through the use of ICT. The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) states that learning is enhanced through the use of multimodal resources, digital environments and technologies within a classroom setting. This is achieved through access to live target language environments and texts via digital media, which extends the boundaries of the classroom (ACARA). Extending the boundaries of the classroom promotes student centred learning, as they are not restricted by the texts or content delivered by the teacher. Students are able to construct their own ideas and knowledge through a variety of informative sources. Therefore, it creates critical and creative thinkers, which is an essential component of being a successful 21st century learner.

Another advantage of a LMS in the classroom is increasing the efficiency of teaching and learning programs, through the delivery of large-scale learning resources (Coates, James & Baldwin, 2005, p. 23). This enables teachers to provide a wider variety of resources, as well as setting various levels of work to suit the learning needs of all students. Ullman (2016, p. 34) mentions that LMS’s provide a learning platform where students can all start with the same material and then grow individually through a particular unit of work. This is a direct link to the DEAG “Principle 3, all learning should be student centred” as using technology within the classroom meets the challenges of establishing effective learning environments through adaptive teaching (DEAG, 2013, p27). This is supported by Wang (2010) as the use of a LMS allows teachers to integrate multimedia tools, creating engaging activities that target student interests and interaction with the content via learner-driven navigation (Lochner, Conrad & Graham, 2015, p. 65).

LMS’s are continually evolving, along with technology. This is an important aspect of teaching as there is an overarching challenge to ensure that digital technologies are used more systematically to improve the quality of education and learning outcomes for all students (DEAG, 2013, p. 23). Wang (2010) suggests that the function of LMS’s are systemic in nature and offer the necessary functionality to support and manage the online learning process (Lochner, Conrad & Graham, 2015, p. 64). This directly links to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers, in particular Standard 2. Know the content and how to teach it and Standard 3. Plan for and implement effective teaching and learning (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL], 2017). Utilising LMS’s provides teachers with the opportunity to integrate various ICT tools to deliver content within a classroom environment. It also allows for the creation of sequential learning spaces, that are productive, engaging and continually monitored.

Reference

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (n.d). General capabilities. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/languages/general-capabilities/

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2017). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards

Coates, H., James, R. & Baldwin, G. (2005). A Critical Examination of the Effects of Learning Management Systems on University Teaching and Learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19–36. Retrieved from  http://uait.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/53312706/A%2520critical%2520examination%2520of%2520the%2520effects%2520of%2520learning%2520management%2520systems.pdf

Digital Education Advisory Group (DEAG). (2013). Beyond the classroom: A new digital education for young Australians in the 21st century. Retrieved from

https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/deag_final_report.pdf

Lochner, B., Conrad, R. M. & Graham, E. (2015). Secondary Teachers’ Concerns in Adopting Learning Management Systems: A U.S. Perspective. Tech Trends, 59(5), 62-70. Retrieved from https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11528-015-0892-4.pdf

Ullman, E. (February, 2016). A personal statement: how schools use learning management systems to create individualized learning journeys. Technology & Learning. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ps/i.do?&id=GALE|A444093629&v=2.1&u=csu_au&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w&authCount=1

Wang, Q. (2010). Using online shared workspaces to support group collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1270-1276. doi 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.023

Hardware in classrooms & Interactive Whiteboards

There are four eras of digital technology; Pre-microcomputer era; 1950s to the late 1970s. The Microcomputer era; 1977 to mid 1980s-1990s. The internet era; 1993 to 1998. Finally the mobile technologies 2005 to 2010, which is referred to as the “era of ubiquitous access” (Roblyer & Doering, 2014, p. 18-19). Throughout the eras, technological hardware has also development and been integrated into the classroom as educational tools. This blog post will look at interactive whiteboards (IWB) as a hardware device.

The IWB mimics the properties of a whiteboard and to some degree simulate the predecessor, the chalkboard, however take  electronic form and are connected to a computer or projector. Information can be projected onto the board and this information can be altered. Properties and functionality vary between models; for example some systems offer a touch screen surface with multiple users able to input simultaneously (Roblyer & Doering, 2014, p. 165).

Popular IWBs are the Prometheus’ Promethean ActivBoard or SMART Technology’s SMART Board. Each have accompanying software/programs and include a resource bank of images, graphic tools and text (Roblyer & Doering, 2014, p. 165).

There has been debate over functionality of IWBs, Lacina (2009) highlights the benefits as; meeting the needs of visual learners, more interactively teaching, engaging students and using multimodal forms of text (Lacina, 2009, p. 271) However, drawbacks include limited capabilities and high cost; the IWB is estimated as $800-$2500, an LCD projector $450-$1500, computer, software and technology support all to be factored (Lacina, 2009, p. 272).

One study found “teachers were enthusiastic, had seen improvements in student engagement” with IWB technology providing a flexible tool, offering a “considerable range of affordances that other technologies may not” (Winzenried, Dalgarno & Tinkler, 2010, p. 534). Winzenried, Dalgarno & Tinkler (2010, p.549) predicts longevity in IWB and continued use overtime, which conflicts with Lacina (2009, p. 272) who states “technology that will quickly grow outdated – and, if not implemented well, that teachers may not use effectively.”

Despite IWB being a highly debateable topic, I really cannot shed any light from personal experience (as I have no teaching experience to date). I’d love to hear from fellow students in regard to their use of IWBs in the classroom. Do you have any advice or recommendations? Please feel free to share your ideas here.

Reference

Interactive whiteboards: Creating higher-level, technological thinkers? Childhood Education, 2009, Vol.85(4), p.270-272

Lacina, J. (2009). Interactive whiteboards: creating higher-level, technological thinkers? Childhood Education, 85(4), 270+. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/apps/doc/A198931292/EAIM?u=csu_au&sid=EAIM&xid=0ffb7ba2

Roblyer, M., & Doering, A. (2014). Pearson New International Edition. Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Harlow, England: Pearson.

Winzenried, A., Dalgarno, B., & Tinkler, J. (2010). The interactive whiteboard: A transitional technology supporting diverse teaching practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology26(4).

Digital Literacy, Technology and our students

New social, textual and technoliterate practices have altered communication, as our students “message, blog, Flickr, Instagram, Facebook, podcast and Twitter their way into their future lives” (Cope & Kalantzis, 2009, p. 167). With these new forms of communication, new literacies have emerged. They are embodied in new social practices—”ways of working in new or transformed forms of employment, new ways of participating as a citizen in public spaces, and even perhaps new forms of identity and personality” (Cope & Kalantzis, 2009, p. 167).

When trying to understanding what digital literacy, the Tedx Talk by Belshaw (2012, March), states that we should be looking at digital literacies, being plural, socially negotiated and view in vary context. Similarly, Josie Fraser, social and educational technologist, Leicester City Council highlights that digital literacy is a combination of digital tool knowledge, critical thinking and social engagement. The characteristics of digital literacies are outlined as “ supports and helps develop traditional literacies, It’s a life-long practice, It’s about skills, competencies and critical reflection on how these skills and competencies are applied and It’s about social engagement” (Anyangwe, 2012, May 16).

The discussion of digital literary progresses to look at “today’s students” and a discussion around the impact of digital exposure. Marc Prensky introduces the term ‘digital native and digital immigrants.” Prensky argues that students today are “native speaks” of the digital language, and teachers, as “digital immigrants” speak an outdated language and therefore struggle to educate a populate who speak “an entirely new language” (Prensky, 2001, October).

However Prensky’s position is one that has attracted much debate. Open University research explodes myth of ‘digital native by concluding “there’s no evidence of a clear-cut digital divide. Use of technology varies with age, but it does so predictably, over the whole age span. And secondly, although younger people are more likely to be positive about technology, there is evidence that a good attitude to technology, at any age, correlates with good study habits.”

For another subject I made an interactive presentation which is relevant to 21st century learning and multiliteracies, which you might like to view on my YouTube channel. Much of the content is complementary to this subject. Please feel free share your thoughts, link to video; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ELToSqmHs

Reference

Anyangwe, E. (2012, May 16). 20 ways of thinking about digital literacy in higher education. The Guardian Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/may/15/digital-literacy-in-universities

Belshaw, D. [Tedx Talks]. (2012, March). The essential elements of digital literacies: Doug Belshaw at TEDxWarwick. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8yQPoTcZ78

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (February, 2001). Putting ‘Multiliteracies’ to the Test. Newsletter of the Australian Literacy Educators Association. Retrieved from https://www.alea.edu.au/documents/item/59

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New Literacies, New Learning, Pedagogies. An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/15544800903076044?needAccess=true

Prensky, M. (2001, October). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

 

 

21st century skills and digital literacy

Literacy was once seen as synonymous with reading, or with reading and writing, the term is now generally accepted as a much broader range of practices within education (Louden, Rohl, Barratt-Pugh, Brown, Cairney, Elderfield, . . . & Rowe, 2005. Cited in Henderson, 2012, p. 6).

Students in the 21st century engage with texts from a variety of sources, which use multiple types of languages. Literacy can now be defined as the ability to understand and use literacy practices within a range of contexts and technologies, in socially responsible ways, in a socially, culturally, and linguistically diverse world and participate in life as an active and informed citizen (Bull & Anstey, 2006).

Kalantzis & Cope (2009, p. 166) suggests that ‘a pedagogy of multiliteracies would need to address this as a fundamental aspect of contemporary teaching and learning’. With this in mind, we start to see the dynamic nature of literacy and how it has changed of time.

The 2008 Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians states “Rapid and continuing advances in information and communication technologies (ICT) are changing the ways people share, use, develop and process information and technology. In this digital age, young people need to be highly skilled in the use of ICT.”

When reviewing the videos; Singapore’s 21st-Century Teaching Strategies (Education Everywhere Series) and Silicon Valley school with no computers. The two schools are at the opposite ends of the spectrum. On one end the Waldorf School of the Peninsula, which has no computers or internet is trying to provide what they refer to as a “natural way to raise children” and a “slow paced developmental childhood” (Edutopia, 2012, March 14). A personal concern is that this reflects the industrial style model which is no longer sufficient for modern society and the demands of the workforce. Interestingly, students from Waldorf do not complete standardised test, and therefore success in their methods cannot be measured. However, the real test, students face will be integration into workforce, or tertiary education and training where the use of digital technologies are a required and considered a social norm.

Ngee Ann Secondary School in Singapore is a “Future School” emphasising the use of technology, digital media, and the integration of 21st century skills. Rather than looking a technology as a distraction, it is viewed as an opportunity as engagement. Ngee Ann has looked at the changing role of the teacher as a facilitator, and no longer having the monopoly of information or knowledge (CNN, 2012, March 13).

When we look at 21st century skills, a major influence on literacy developments is the implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into classroom practices. A multiliteracies framework is an important tool for educators, as it highlights two major changes within the teaching profession. They are the “growing significance of cultural and linguistic diversity” and the “influence of new communication technologies” (Cope & Kalantzis, 2001).

Reference

Bull, M., & Anstey, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (February, 2001). Putting ‘Multiliteracies’ to the Test. Newsletter of the Australian Literacy Educators Association. Retrieved from https://www.alea.edu.au/documents/item/59

Louden, W., Rohl, M., Barratt-Pugh, C., Brown, C., Cairney, T., Elderfield, J., . . . & Rowe, K. (2005). In Teachers’ Hands. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(3), 181-253

Edutopia. (2012, March 14). Singapore’s 21st-Century Teaching Strategies (Education Everywhere Series). [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_pIK7ghGw4

CNN. (2012, March 13). Silicon Valley school with no computers. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUxLKik3zNA

 

Technology and Learning

Rowan and Bigum looks that they ways in which schools and school systems respond to and “new technologies” and argue that such patters are likely to continue into the future.

These “patterns of response” are identified as response to digital products, which are designed or created for educational purposes, a need to ensure they have technology which compares to their counterparts (and in some cases this takes a forms of elitism), and finally the need to monitor technologies, in “response to concerns that, left unchecked, technologies could disrupt the patterns of schooling and, by extension, student learning”(Rowan & Bigum, 2012, p. 15). The last point of shifting control is also raised in the Alan Novembers’ video and will be visited below.

Rowan and Bigum look at the relationship between computers and education, and more specifically the broader social and economic content that links ICTs with “desirable characteristics” such as “improvement, efficiency and, by extension, educational status” (Rowan & Bigum, 2012, p.  20).

Interestingly, there is a practical overview of how new ICTs are introduced into schools and form part of existing or previous school practices. At a local level teachers or principals or policy makers, are “deciding whether new technology can be successfully domesticated or schooled, that is to say: able to be engineered into the existing routines and structures of a school” (Rowan & Bigum, 2012, p. 21).

Cox identifies the difficulties in researching e-learning, due to the everchanging nature and increasing access to IT “changing the balance between formal and informal uses of e-learning” Cox, 2012, p 1). While investigating the challenges and issues, Cox highlights that policy makers have recognised the importance of e-learning, however there still remains “misconceptions about its potential to enhance student learning” (Cox, 2012, p 17).  the situation and conditions acknowledged that there is evidence e-learning can enhance student learning (Cox, 2012, p. 16).

Cox raises some interesting issues when reviewing the conditions of e-learning; namely that teacher and student engagement with e-learning are limited to a small range of technologies, that there has been a shift from educational designed resources towards “commercially focused” resources, and finally that there is a digital divide within communities which impact upon IT use and e-learning experiences (Cox, 2012, p. 17).

Some of the issues raised by Cox, Rowan and Bigum are addressed in the four “calls to action” in regards to teaching and learning processes;

“They deal with the relationship between (1) ICT and 21st century learning; (2) restructuring schools to be able to use technology in addressing individual needs of students; (3) the need for new assessment structures to be able to measure outcomes of technology-rich experiences; and (4) the relationship between formal and informal learning experiences and its implications for formal learning” (Voogt, Knezek, Cox , Knezek & Brummelhuis, 2011 p. 2).

 

Alan November in the video Myths and opportunities: Technology in the classroom, as the names suggests discusses misconceptions of technology, but also identifies learning opportunities which technology can afford. Doubling as a cooking show (how good did that Lobster look?) November identifies three myths, namely technology will; be the equalisers of society, offer diversity of opinion (globally) and make kids smarter. On the other hand, the opportunities are global communicator, global researcher, tool builder and internal collaborator, and these skills are essential to the modern workplace and the skills required in the 21st century.

Reference

Cox, M.J. (2013), Formal to informal learning with IT: research challenges and issues for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Retrieved from  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00483.x/abstract;jsessionid=3A22FA5B169A95E11AB1C92081A21B42.f03t02

Rowan, L., & Bigum, C. (Eds.). (2012). Transformative approaches to new technologies and student diversity in futures oriented classrooms : future proofing education. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au

Voogt J., Knezek G., Cox M.J., Knezek D.& Ten Brummelhuis A. (2011) Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x

November, A. [November Learning]. 2009, March 30).  Myths and Opportunities: Technology in the Classroom by Alan November [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/3930740